We often receive inquiries as to how the ‘local time’ is pegged to a user’s time zone when a sender may be logging in from different computers in different time zones.
Factoring and commercial finance firms worldwide are gaining an edge by going paperless, but not without first managing the risks of standard email.
The Best Article Describing Issues with Email Proof, Email Fraud, and E-Discovery. “Don’t Let Your Get Trashed”
One of the best articles that we have come across that succinctly discusses the issues associated with email proof, email fraud, electronic discovery of stored information, ease of manipulating email records, and difficulty in authenticating email records that have been challenged, is the following The National Law Journal article. After reading this, you will have a clear understanding as to why so many rely on RPost’s Registered Receipt™ email records returned to them when they send email of consequence with RPost’s Registered Email™ service.
The following is a useful primer for those that need to consider the evolving methods and concerns in dealing with electronic discovery of documents and information in the context of a current or potential legal dispute.
Having received some recent inquiries from customers about relying on RPost’s service records (in particular, the Registered Receipt™ emails associated with the Registered Email™ services for email proof and the email encryption service) in the context of responding to e-discovery requests, we have added the following quick reference for paper and resources to the e-discovery court rules in the United States.
Just when you thought that you were getting comfortable with email records and e-discovery concerns…
Until it happens to you or a colleague, most people pay little attention to the risks of conducting important business or personal transactions using simple email only to have its content or delivery challenged after-the-fact. Since RPost is in the business of offering the Registered Email™ service that at its core provides the sender with verifiable proof of delivery, content and official time stamps, of email (and all attachments) sent to any Internet address, the company hears many horror stories about the damages caused by email content alterations and disputes arising over delivery and / or the timing of the delivery.
Electronic Signatures Documents have the Same Legal Strength of Wet Ink Signatures
E-business transactions – Did you know that if executed properly from beginning to end they can reduce all types of risk and make e-contracts more enforceable than paper processes. However, simply complying with the ten-year old ESIGN Act that affords electronically-signed documents the same legal strength of wet signature, paper documents does not protect against possible disputes nor are such electronic records always considered to be admissible in a court of law.
Electronic Transactions Would Be Afforded the Same Validity and Legality as Paper Transactions
Background: Enactment of electronic laws – the Electronic Signatures in global commerce Act (ESIGN, the federal statute) and the Uniform Electronic Transactions Act (UETA – adopted by forty-six states) are basically similar and were designed to facilitate electronic transactions consistent with other applicable law by simplifying, clarifying and modernizing the law governing commerce and governmental transactions through the use of electronic means.
These statutes were drafted with the intent of ensuring that electronic transactions would be afforded the same validity and legality as paper transactions – to accommodate and promote the efficiencies of digital information.
The foundation upon which these two laws are based can be broken down to the following rules:
• A record or signature may not be denied legal effect or enforceability solely because it is in electronic form;
• A contract may not be denied legal effect or enforceability solely because an electronic record was used in its formation;
• If a law requires a record to be in writing, an electronic record satisfies the law; and
• If a law requires a signature, an electronic signature satisfies the law.
These three building blocks are themselves built upon three defined terms: “record, electronic record and electronic signature.” Both UETA and ESIGN define a “record” as information that is inscribed on a tangible medium or that is stored in an electronic or other medium and is retrievable in perceivable form. An “electronic record” is similarly defined as a record created, generated, sent, communicated, received, or stored by electronic means. As a result, any type of document, contract, or other record of information could meet the definition of an electronic record if it were created, used, or stored in a medium other than paper. An “electronic signature” is an electronic sound, symbol, or process attached to or logically associated with a record and executed or adopted by a person with the intent to sign the record.
Digital Information – Burden of Proof: Permitting electronic records to substitute for writings serves little purpose if the records are not court-admissible as evidence in the event of a dispute. The rule stated above is simple: A record or signature may not be excluded from evidence solely because it is in electronic form. An electronic record also qualifies as an original, even if that record is not the original form of the document, and satisfies statutory audit and record retention requirements. Beyond that, the ordinary rules of evidence will apply.
With this in mind, it is critical that private and public sector enterprises create and handle their electronic information properly so that there is proper accountability, authenticity is insured and records can be easily retained and retrieved. Everyday electronic communication must be able to stand the test of evidentiary proof along with that of electronic records, transactions, etc. and it is the content not the technology that is critical during a challenge.
Transporting Digital Information – Explanation of Electronic Services to be Employed: Using readily available technology, insurers will employ an e-mail service that complies with the federal and state electronic signature laws in transporting electronic documents to state DMV offices that will provide legally valid evidence of successful delivery to sender (and to recipient as an option if needed.)
The RPost core service to be employed provides the sender with legal proof of delivery, content and official time stamp, including all attachments. Additional service features that may be employed by insurers include electronic signature, electronic contracting and end-to-end e-mail encryption. The service will deliver a Registered Email™ messages, with attachments to state DMV offices and automatically return verifiable delivery evidence in the form of a Registered Receipt™ e-mail containing a digital snapshot of the content (message body and all attachments) and the official time the e-mail was sent and received by each designated recipient. An e-sign-off feature incorporates a valid electronic signature of the recipient into the process where needed. As a means of providing accountable electronic communication, the service to be employed by insurers in transmitting electronic records and documents to state DMV offices will employ a technology that: a) does not store information on a central server; b) maintains the integrity of electronic communications and the security of the transmission using cryptography; c) provides the sender proof of delivery to the recipient; and d) provides an encrypted, tamper-proof record of the transaction that may include verifiable proof of both the delivery and acknowledgement or execution of any document.
Types of documents to be electronically delivered by insurers: Given that it is in the best interest of both insured and insurer to resolve auto total loss claims as quickly as possible; and with a desire to reduce overall mail and courier expenses the following documents could be delivered electronically to the insured for electronic signature sign-off where needed:
• Third party releases (in the case of a lien)
• Regulatory letters (where proof of delivery is required)
• Letter of Guaranty
• Proof of Loss (authorization to obtain information)
• Validation of Owner (sign-off only)
• Property / Damage release
• Odometer statement
• Power of Attorney
The ability to electronically sign the following will greatly enhance processing timeframes:
• Power of Attorney, e-signed
• Authorization to pay the claim, e-signed
• Confirmation that the auto was presently located at salvage yard, e-signed
I was recently asked a question by an insurance company in Massachusetts that is likely a question on the minds of many who are looking to cut cost and reduce paper and mail use in the insurance sector. As such, let me share my response to their question, “…could we move to convert our thousands of insurance cancellation notices from first class mail with certificate of sending to Registered Email™ service by RPost?” Since RPost does not provide legal advice, the following should only be used as a framework for further analysis by one’s own legal counsel.